When you won’t pay 5p for a bag…

This is me when I forget my disposable bag which happens a lot!ūüôā ¬†– via BeyondSkin

Posted in sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BBC is burying its streaming business alive this September #iplayer #tech

So we all know the news. From September 1, 2016 anyone watching BBC shows on demand will be legally required to have a TV licence. I understand the sentiment. BBC is funded from TV licence. You want to watch BBC Рyou need to pay for TV licence. BBC were pushed by rivals, other content providers, into charging for their content.

The questions that the move arises are numerous: Channel4 and ITV on demand services remain free, then why BBC only? What about people who can’t afford a TV licence? This may further isolate them. Do we overall believe TV licence is a good model for the 21st century where increasingly people stream their content and often don’t own a TV, or¬†should we use this as an opportunity for a complete overhaul and look for better, more flexible and accessible pay TV models that are out there?

It’s total ignorance of the market trends that bothers me. Streaming is growing. There are many people who do not watch traditional TV (cord cutters) or snack on content across platforms. If they want to keep access to BBC iPlayer or Kids, they would prefer to pay a monthly fee, on a pay as you go basis. Whereas TV¬†licence is¬†effectively¬†an annual contract, you can pay monthly (¬£12 a month), but for a year and in the first 6 months you have to pay ¬£24 a month. Why? What is the logic here?

When I pay £7.49 for Netflix monthly, around £70 for Prime yearly, both on pay as you go basis, and only intend to use BBC Kids for example, without watching live TV, £24 and £145.50 seems an unfair overinflated fee. £12 or less a month on a pay as you go basis would have been more logical but then this is where TV licence like all other traditional institutions locks itself in its outdated logic. It is £145.50 a year or the highway.  Continue reading

Posted in tech, marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Largest beach clean up – Mumbai #trash #ocean

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

9 tips for living with less plastic

img_8623

Posted in sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Engineering mobility toys for disabled kids #tech

Sometimes it’s not about profit. Sometimes it’s about inclusion, enabling and bringing smilesūüôā ¬†It’s tech but not like you know it.

Posted in impact, other, tech | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Which business are you – Donotreply or Contactus? #fintech

I recently received 2 emails Рboth from financial services companies. They look similar, but there is a major difference. One is sent from Donotreply@ address, another from @Contactus (with a Contact button underneath). One from a traditional bank, another from a fintech startup. Which one do you think cares about me as a customer? Which one I will trust? And as a marketer, which one would you bet on as a future success?

img_8543 img_8545

Posted in fintech, marketing, tech | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Only when it is too late…

img_8245

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment